Entries Tagged as ''

How To Destroy The Web 2.0 Look

原文地址:http://www.snap2objects.com/2007/11/20/how-to-destroy-the-web-20-look/

A trend always appears as the result of the opposition with another.
The once full of detail Gothic art was replaced with pure straight
lines from the Greek temples in the Renaissance. The tons of hair
spray, glitter and multicolor spandex 80’s were demolished by the black
& white minimalism from the 90’s.

The web is not the exception. In the beginning, there was not light
on the web. It was awfully crowded with dancing marquees, tedious
frames, unbearable midis and annoying spinning @’s. It was the dark
ages of the web. Then refreshing empty spaces, vibrant, high contrast
colors, lovely gradients, big text, original gloss shine effect,
diagonal lines and of course reflected logos came on our rescue.
Everything was shiny and with that great brandnu smell. The Web 2.0
look was born.

But guess what?

There are some people getting tired of that. Call them revolutionaries, or trend setters. I call them visionaries. Elliot Jay Stocks is my new hero. He took part on Future of Web Design event, held in NY, with a talk called “Destroy The Web 2.0 Look“.

In his talk, he demonstrates how the current web style is overdone
and making sites look like Dollies (cloned sheep). Mr Stocks also noted
that what makes a site part of the web 2.0 is not its looks, is the way
it works. He shows how the “Web 2.0″ is not about aesthetics, it just
has been misunderstood by the web design recruitment industry and
marketers, among others; thinking that look will translate into
success. As a conclusion, the designer invites us to educate people on
what the web 2.0 really means, and to learn from the best and try to
adapt the trends to our own designs.

I agree with Elliot Jay when he recommends us to adapt trends and to
try and educate our clients in the matter. Also, we must agree that
despite the obvious cliché repetition, there are some characteristics
worth being preserved even on the trendiest designs: nice big text,
loads of white space and centered alignment, for example.

Now, if the web 2.0 look is already dated and we have been told to destroy it, the remaing question is:

How To Destroy The Web 2.0 Look?

First lets retake what makes the looks of the web 2.0

  • Vibrant, high contrast colors
  • “Special offer” badges
  • Gloss/ Sheen
  • Bevelled edges
  • Gradients
  • Diagonal Lines
  • Shinny Table Reflection Effect

Now you may agree with me that the result of that is an attractive,
clean and neat design, but some times almost aseptic and due to its
popularization lack of personality.

First I recommend you to read an excellent post Why should your site have “personality” made by Robert,
a guest blogger. Robert describes how to be honest in design and the
importance of uniqueness and how it should reflect the business true
personality.

Then I am going to show and describe the common characteristics of
some sites I believe are the answer to the cloned-aseptic current web
style.

http://www.biola.edu/undergrad/

http://www.bandpush.ca/

http://www.bittbox.com/

http://www.cameronmoll.com/portfolio/

http://darklightart.com/

http://elliotjaystocks.com/

http://eyecandyanimation.com/

http://fisticuffdesign.com/

http://www.jrvelasco.com/

http://www.kcrevolution.org/

http://www.knoxville.org/

http://student.opendoorsuk.org/

http://student.opendoorsuk.org/

http://trojanrecords.com/

http://www.dirtyprettythingsband.com/

As you could see, those sites are the opposite to the current style.
Despite this, it is an answer to the current trend you can still see
some elements that survived, like the big text and the main layout.

However, in the unique and trendy design of each of them we can put
the finger on common elements like the retro/vintage look and influence of grunge organic elements and rich textures.

Let’s identify those elements in detail:

  • Retro-Vintage
  • Warm Dark Color Palette
  • Rich and Organic Textures
  • Grunge-Retro Fonts
  • Rough Edges
  • Ornaments
  • Stains
  • Rich Full Layered Headers

Retro-Vintage

The allusion to retro is a commonplace giving a cozy yet evoking
feeling. Here we can see an old Polaroid photo (a very nice retro
resource). And also notice the old radios in both of the samples as
well a representation of vintage printings.

Warm Dark Color Palette

The use of dark colors, like dark brown, burgundy and mustard in
lots of variations and shades in association with that retro look.
Contrasting with the brilliant, high contrasting colors of the current
trend.

Rich Textures

Sometimes organic, simulating wood, stone, stained walls or vintages wallpapers.

Grunge-Retro Fonts

Say goodbye to the typical rounded-corners bold fonts we use today.
Say hi to old school looking fonts and grunge typefaces full of rough
edges and detail.

Rough Edges

This is another grunge feature. It is the uneven finishing effect on
boxes, frames or heading. Achieved by effects like ripped paper of
paint splats.

Ornaments

Ornaments have been doing their shy appearance on many current web
2.0 designs nowadays. But even more so in the retro designs. I
particularly like the clean look of the 2.0 look with some ornaments
like floral partterns.

Stains

This is again a grunge feature, but also vintage. Adding stains like
paint splatters gives the ilussion of something worn by the passage of
time. Something that has been used and abused resulting on a sense of
familiarity.

Rich Full Layered Headers

This headers are designs masterpieces, not big solid areas anymore.
Many layers and objects telling a story, speaking with voice about its
author or the product sold.

The current web style is going to last for quite more time. But we
can’t deny that there are some trend setters that are in the quest for
their own identify, trying to avoid cliches. Of course if this trend
happens to replace the ongoing one with time, it will turn to be a
cliche as well and then another trend will come. I think the secret is
to be an early adopter and adapt each one to our needs and design
angles.

Technorati Tags: , ,

Understanding Web Design

原文来源:alistapart 作者:Zeldman
We get better design when we understand our medium. Yet even at this late cultural hour, many people don’t understand web design. Among them can be found some of our most distinguished business and cultural leaders, including a few who possess a profound grasp of design—except as it relates to the web.

Some who don’t understand web design nevertheless have the job of creating websites or supervising web designers and developers. Others who don’t understand web design are nevertheless professionally charged with evaluating it on behalf of the rest of us. Those who understand the least make the most noise. They are the ones leading charges, slamming doors, and throwing money—at all the wrong people and things.

If we want better sites, better work, and better-informed clients, the need to educate begins with us.

Preferring real estate to architecture

It’s hard to understand web design when you don’t understand the web. And it’s hard to understand the web when those who are paid to explain it either don’t get it themselves, or are obliged for commercial reasons to suppress some of what they know, emphasizing the Barnumesque over the brilliant.

The news media too often gets it wrong. Too much internet journalism follows the money; too little covers art and ideas. Driven by editors pressured by publishers worried about vanishing advertisers, even journalists who understand the web spend most of their time writing about deals and quoting dealmakers. Many do this even when the statement they’re quoting is patently self-serving and ludicrous—like Zuckerberg’s Law.

It’s not that Zuckerberg’s not news; and it’s not that business isn’t some journalists’ beat. But focusing on business to the exclusion of all else is like reporting on real estate deals while ignoring architecture.

And one tires of the news narrative’s one-dimensionalism. In 1994, the web was weird and wild, they told us. In ‘99 it was a kingmaker; in ‘01, a bust. In ‘02, news folk discovered blogs; in ‘04, perspiring guest bloggers on CNN explained how citizen journalists were reinventing news and democracy and would determine who won that year’s presidential election. I forget how that one turned out.

When absurd predictions die ridiculous deaths, nobody resigns from the newsroom, they just throw a new line into the water—like marketers replacing a slogan that tanked. After decades of news commoditization, what’s amazing is how many good reporters there still are, and how hard many try to lay accurate information before the public. Sometimes you can almost hear it beneath the roar of the grotesque and the exceptional.

The sustainable circle of self-regard

News media are not the only ones getting it wrong. Professional associations get it wrong every day, and commemorate their wrongness with an annual festival. Each year, advertising and design magazines and professional organizations hold contests for “new media design” judged by the winners of last year’s competitions. That they call it “new media design” tells them nothing and you and me everything.

Although there are exceptions, for the most part the creators of winning entries see the web as a vehicle for advertising and marketing campaigns in which the user passively experiences Flash and video content. For the active user, there is gaming—but what you and I think of as active web use is limited to clicking a “Digg this page” button.

The winning sites look fabulous as screen shots in glossy design annuals. When the winners become judges, they reward work like their own. Thus sites that behave like TV and look good between covers continue to be created, and a generation of clients and art directors thinks that stuff is the cream of web design.

Design critics get it wrong, too

People who are smart about print can be less bright about the web. Their critical faculties, honed to perfection during the Kerning Wars, smash to bits against the barricades of our profession.

The less sophisticated lament on our behalf that we are stuck with ugly fonts. They wonder aloud how we can enjoy working in a medium that offers us less than absolute control over every atom of the visual experience. What they are secretly asking is whether or not we are real designers. (They suspect that we are not.) But these are the juniors, the design students and future critics. Their opinions are chiefly of interest to their professors, and one prays they have good ones.

More sophisticated critics understand that the web is not print and that limitations are part of every design discipline. Yet even these eggheads will sometimes succumb to fallacious comparatives. (I’ve done it myself, although long ago and strictly for giggles.) Where are the masterpieces of web design, these critics cry. That Google Maps might be as representative of our age as the Mona Lisa was of Leonardo’s—and as brilliant, in its way—satisfies many of us as an answer, but might not satisfy the design critic in search of a direct parallel to, oh, I don’t know, let’s say Milton Glaser’s iconic Bob Dylan poster.

Typography, architecture, and web design

The trouble is, web design, although it employs elements of graphic design and illustration, does not map to them. If one must compare the web to other media, typography would be a better choice. For a web design, like a typeface, is an environment for someone else’s expression. Stick around and I’ll tell you which site design is like Helvetica.

Architecture (the kind that uses steel and glass and stone) is also an apt comparison—or at least, more apt than poster design. The architect creates planes and grids that facilitate the dynamic behavior of people. Having designed, the architect relinquishes control. Over time, the people who use the building bring out and add to the meaning of the architect’s design.

Of course, all comparisons are gnarly by nature. What is the “London Calling” of television? Who is the Jane Austen of automotive design? Madame Butterfly is not less beautiful for having no car chase sequence, peanut butter no less tasty because it cannot dance.

So what is web design?

Web design is not book design, it is not poster design, it is not illustration, and the highest achievements of those disciplines are not what web design aims for. Although websites can be delivery systems for games and videos, and although those delivery systems can be lovely to look at, such sites are exemplars of game design and video storytelling, not of web design. So what is web design?

Web design is the creation of digital environments that facilitate and encourage human activity; reflect or adapt to individual voices and content; and change gracefully over time while always retaining their identity.

Let’s repeat that, with emphasis:

Web design is the creation of digital environments that facilitate and encourage human activity; reflect or adapt to individual voices and content; and change gracefully over time while always retaining their identity.

She walks in beauty

Great web designs are like great typefaces: some, like Rosewood, impose a personality on whatever content is applied to them. Others, like Helvetica, fade into the background (or try to), magically supporting whatever tone the content provides. (We can argue tomorrow whether Helvetica is really as neutral as water.)

Which web design is like that? For one, Douglas Bowman’s white “Minima” layout for Blogger, used by literally millions of writers—and it feels like it was designed for each of them individually. That is great design.

Great web designs are like great buildings. All office buildings, however distinctive, have lobbies and bathrooms and staircases. Websites, too, share commonalities.

Although a great site design is completely individual, it is also a great deal like other site designs that perform similar functions. The same is true of great magazine and newspaper layouts, which differ from banal magazine and newspaper layouts in a hundred subtle details. Few celebrate great magazine layouts, yet millions consciously or unconsciously appreciate them, and nobody laments that they are not posters.

The inexperienced or insufficiently thoughtful designer complains that too many websites use grids, too many sites use columns, too many sites are “boxy.” Efforts to avoid boxiness have been around since 1995; while occasionally successful, they have most often produced aesthetically wretched and needlessly unusable designs.

The experienced web designer, like the talented newspaper art director, accepts that many projects she works on will have headers and columns and footers. Her job is not to whine about emerging commonalities but to use them to create pages that are distinctive, natural, brand-appropriate, subtly memorable, and quietly but unmistakably engaging.

If she achieves all that and sweats the details, her work will be beautiful. If not everyone appreciates this beauty—if not everyone understands web design—then let us not cry for web design, but for those who cannot see.

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

99 Resources for Web 2.0 Design

BADGES

Web 2.0 Badges - A set of free badges to download and use in your own designs.

Fresh Badge - Quickly generate your own badge.

adClustr - Starburst badges.

Deziner Folio - A collection of different badges.

BittBox - Free vector badges.

Official Seal Generator - An alternative to the typical badge.

Photoshop Tutorial - A quick lesson on making your own badge.

Glossy Photoshop Tutorial - Create a glossy badge with this tutorial.

BUTTONS

My Cool Button - A nice online tool that will help you to quickly create the button that you want.

Adam Kalsey’s Button Maker - Simple tool to make your own buttons.

Button Maker from Blog Flux - Create your own custom button.

Brilliant Button Maker - A similar button maker to the previous 2.

CSS Buttons - Choose the text, border, and background.

Buttonator - A paid option for creating buttons.

RSS Button Maker - The name pretty much says it all.

Button Boost - A little bit different than some of the other button generators.

ButtonGenerator.com - Create buttons for navigation menus.

Crystal Button - Slick web buttons made easy.

Chicklet Creator - Create buttons that allow visitors to subscribe in their feed reader of choice.

ROUNDED CORNERS

Rounded corners are a staple in web 2.0 design. Here are some tools
and scripts that will help you to quickly create your own rounded
corners.

RoundedCornr

Corner Shop

Spiffy Box

Canvas Corner

Spanky Corners

Sliding Doors Text Box

Smart Rounded Corners

Rounded Corners in CSS

News List

LOGOS

Each of these tools will create a simple web 2.0 style logo.

Logo Creatr

Web 2.0 Logo Creator

Web 2.0 Logo Creatr

Web 2.0 Logo Creator

Web 2.0 Stylr

ICONS

A web 2.0 site can’t ignore icons. Here are some free collections of icons to use in your own projects.

Web 2.0 icons

UtomBox - A great collection of web 2.0 icons.

Feed Icons - The standard RSS icon.

Map Icon Factory - Create your own map icon.

Perishable Press - A nice collection of RSS icons.

Glass Style RSS Icons

Snap2Objects - Vector RSS icons.

31 Sources of Quality, Free Icons

GRADIENT IMAGES

Another common element of web 2.0 is gradient images. Here are a few tools to help you.

Gradient Image Maker

Gradient Generator

Online Gradient Image Maker (OGIM)

SPEECH BUBBLES

Speech bubbles are commonly used for styling comments or blockquotes.

Speech Bubbles from Will Mayo

Will Mayo

Bubblesnaps

CSS Play

XHTML Speech Bubbles

WigFlip

Fluid CSS Speech Bubbles

MySpace Speech Bubble Generator

Photoshop Tutorial

BACKGROUND IMAGES

Background Image Maker - Create background images with choices like transparency and gradients.

Stripe Generator 2.0 -
If you’re looking to add a striped background to an element on your
page, you can use this tool to customize the look you want.

Stripe Designer - Easily create striped images.

Tartan Maker - Create a tartan background image.

Texture Generator - Creates textured images that you can use as a background.

All Free Backgrounds - Choose the background you want.

COLORS

The Colors of Web 2.0 - Are you looking to match the color of a popular web 2.0 site?

Web 2.0 Color Pallete - Popular web 2.o colors.

Color Schemer Gallery - Having problems choosing a color scheme? Find one you like in this gallery.

COLOURlovers - More samples of color combinations.

Website Color Picker - Test color combinations quickly.

I Like Your Colors - Get the colors used by a particular site.

NAVIGATION

CSS Menu Generator - Easily create attractive CSS menus.

Listamatic - Collection of CSS menus.

List-O-Matic - Create your own CSS menus.

List-U-Like - Another tool to create your own navigation bars.

Tabs Generator - Create tabbed images for navigation.

Flash Buttons - Create navigation menus with flash buttons

CSS Play - An extensive collection of CSS menus.

Exploding Boy - Tabbed CSS navigation menus.

CSS Navigation Menu Generator - A tool to help you create your own menu.

FAVICONS

Favicon Generator - Create your own favicon from an image on your computer.

Favicon from Pics - Create a favicon from a photo.

Favicon Editor - Upload a photo, create a favicon.

Favicon.cc - Another option for favicons.

Photoshop Tutorial - Creating a favicon with Photoshop.

CHARTS

PHP/SWF Charts - Create attractive charts.

amCharts - Flash charts.

OTHER

Avatar Maker - Create and edit an avatar.

Shrink Pictures - Create an avatar from your photo.

ScaleNine - Collection of skins and themes created for Flex and Adobe AIR.

VectorMagic - Converts bitmap images to vector art.

Templatr - Create a layout.

PsycHo - Blog template generator.

Web 2.0 Generator - Creates layouts.

Typetester - Compare fonts on-screen.

BlogPoll - Create a free poll for your blog.

RSSxl - Convert an HTML page to RSS.

Meta Tag Generator - Easily create meta tags for your pages.

URL Rewrite - Create search engine-friendly URLs for dynamic pages.

.htacces generator - Quickly create an .htaccess file.

Thumbnail Generator - Create thumbnails for a large amount of images.

Reflection.js - Adds reflections to your photos.

Drop Shadow - Improve your images with a drop shadow.

CSS Sprite Generator - From Website Performance.

Vecteezy - Stupid name. Cool vectors.

Brusheezy - Photoshop brushes.

PSBrushes.net - More Photoshop brushes.

deviantART - Photoshop brushes at deviantART

Technorati Tags: ,